cpe reduction assay (Promega)
Structured Review

Cpe Reduction Assay, supplied by Promega, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cpe reduction assay/product/Promega
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Repurposing Drugs for Mayaro Virus: Identification of EIDD-1931, Favipiravir and Suramin as Mayaro Virus Inhibitors"
Article Title: Repurposing Drugs for Mayaro Virus: Identification of EIDD-1931, Favipiravir and Suramin as Mayaro Virus Inhibitors
Journal: Microorganisms
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9040734
Figure Legend Snippet: Optimization of a CPE-reduction antiviral assay. ( A ) Percentage CPE and ( B ) Z’ value per MAYV inoculum in different cell lines (Vero, BHK, Huh-7, CRL2522 and A549 cells). Results were obtained with the MTS/PMS read-out method. Mean values ± standard deviations (SD) are shown of 3 independent experiments. CPE, cytopathogenic effect; PFU, plaque-forming unit. ( C ) Z’ value for three different MAYV inocula (MOI 0.01, 0.005, 0.001) on Vero cells. Data are presented as box plots showing individual and mean values of four independent experiments. MOI, multiplicity of infection.
Techniques Used: Antiviral Assay, Infection
Figure Legend Snippet: In vitro antiviral effect of EIDD-1931, favipiravir, suramin and ribavirin in Vero cells. ( A ) Dose–response effect of EIDD-1931, favipiravir, suramin and ribavirin on MAYV-induced CPE (MOI 0.01), quantified in Vero cells by the MTS/PMS method. Data shown are mean values ± standard deviations (SD) from three independent experiments. ( B – E ) The effect of different concentrations of ( B ) EIDD-1931, ( C ) favipiravir, ( D ) suramin and ( E ) ribavirin on the release of MAYV particles by infected Vero cells (MOI 0.01). Both viral RNA (genome copies/mL; blue) and infectious progeny virus (TCID 50 /mL; orange) were quantified at 48 h pi by real-time qRT-PCR and end-point titrations, respectively. Data shown are mean values ± SD from three independent experiments. Significant differences from untreated virus control were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis test (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.005). CPE, cytopathogenic effect; TCID, tissue culture infectious dose; VC, virus control (untreated); LOD, limit of detection.
Techniques Used: In Vitro, Infection, Quantitative RT-PCR
